YMN The Young Mathematicians' Network
Serving the Community of Young Mathematicians
Sections: Front Page   Career   Diaries   Editors   Work and Family Life   Grad Life   Job Search   Misc   Paths to Math   Research   Teaching   Undergrad Life   Events   Frequently Asked Questions   News
Story Problem Research

By coryking
Posted Tue Sep 26, 2006 at 11:22:50 AM PDT
A 302 metric ton train leaves station A at 3:12am pacific standard time.  It must arrive at station B, 103 kilometers away, at exactly 4:32am, PST.

The train has been modified so that it can only accelerate or de-accelerate.  The train cannot travel at a constant velocity.

The engineer would like the train to have a constant acceleration for the first half, and a constant negative acceleration for the last half.

Ignoring friction or wind resistance, what should he use for a rate of acceleration?  How much energy will the train consume over the entire trip?  If, instead, the train could travel at a constant speed, would the engineer use less fuel if he were to travel the majority of the trip at a constant velocity?  If we account for wind or friction, which train would be more efficient?

Post a Comment

< New Mersenne Prime Discovered | YMN/Project NExT Poster Session >
Display: Sort:
Story Problem | 0 comments (0 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:
Menu
create account
FAQ
Search
Recent Comments

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Related Links
Also by coryking

SourceForge Logo Powered by Scoop
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest

create account | faq | search