|
Story Problem
|
Research
|
By coryking
Posted Tue Sep 26, 2006 at 11:22:50 AM PDT
|
|
A 302 metric ton train leaves station A at 3:12am pacific standard time. It must arrive at station B, 103 kilometers away, at exactly 4:32am, PST.
The train has been modified so that it can only accelerate or de-accelerate. The train cannot travel at a constant velocity.
The engineer would like the train to have a constant acceleration for the first half, and a constant negative acceleration for the last half.
Ignoring friction or wind resistance, what should he use for a rate of acceleration? How much energy will the train consume over the entire trip? If, instead, the train could travel at a constant speed, would the engineer use less fuel if he were to travel the majority of the trip at a constant velocity? If we account for wind or friction, which train would be more efficient?
Post a Comment
|
|
|